SciFlicks.com - Science Fiction Cinema
Home | Sci-Fi Movie Guides | Artists | SQUAD! Forums | Advertise!  
SciFlicks.com > All SciFlicks Guides > X-Men > Review
 
X-Men: The Movie
 Details
    CAST & CREW
    REVIEW
    FACTS
    SQUAD! FORUM 
 Multimedia
    VIDEOS
    SOUNDS
    PICTURES
    QUOTES
 Memorabilia
    POSTERS
    DVD, CD, BOOK
 Miscellaneous
    FEEDBACK
    LINKS
X-MEN The Review

Human Rating: 3.5 / 5 Alien Rating: Government Cover Up
 

Welcome to the future...

X-MenNow I must admit to not having followed the X-Men comic book (or animated TV series for that matter) since I was a kid in the late 1970s. So I wouldn't really know whether this movie version of the Marvel comic (about outcast mutant superheroes who has to battle the prejudices of ordinary humans - as if you didn't know that!) would satisfy hardcore fans. Then again, fans can be so anal and one shouldn't spend too much time indoors with any real life equivalents of the Comic Book Store Guy from The Simpsons.

Viewers unfamiliar with X-Men lore will however be drawn to the movie because of its surface similarities to The Matrix (1999). Chances are they'll be disappointed - although featuring some good special effects sequences, X-Men is a rarity: an understated superhero comic book movie adaptation. It'll disappoint those expecting any fierce pyrotechnics. The movie's task is closer to that of last year's Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999), namely establish all the characters and themes for an ongoing movie franchise.

X-MenWhich brings us to another thing: when I picked up some X-Men comics a few years back and tried getting back into it, I found the series to be the comic book equivalent of LA Law or a day-time soap opera. There was a horde of characters, each with his/her/its own backstory and subplots. Getting into the groove of the story was practically impossible because of the confusion. Wisely director Bryan Singer (Usual Suspects) tries to keep the amount of characters to a practical minimum to avoid too much confusion. Sure, some comic geek will complain about some or the other character from the comics being left out, but take my word: it is for the best.

While not as good as it could have been, X-Men is nowhere as bad as it could have been (namely as craptacular as Spawn (1997) and Batman & Robin (1997)). It is quite entertaining, but it is simply too short. The ending feels like an anti-climax and you'll probably want more when the credits start rolling. No doubt there'll be sequels, and if this movie is merely setting up the scenario for future films, then roll on X-Men 2 I say.

Review by James O'Ehley from The Sci-Fi Movie Page.

 
 
X-Men Discussion Forum   X-Men Discussion Forum  
  Share your thoughts on this flick!
Click here...
 
    Latest topics and reviews discussed:
CamfanX-men First Class: Singers Back on Prequel
Sounds boring, very very boring, but then I've never exactly been the biggest X-Men fan anyway....
More / Reply
SF_not_Sci-FiDo you view the X-Men movies as a metaphor on Sexuality?
The movies were made a decade into the comic's use of the sexuality metaphor. I don't see what this ...
More / Reply
mackWolverine - Let the Prequels Begin!
looks good, actually. :D [b]cast:[/b] best to notice is [b]Ryan Reynolds[/b] and [b]Will.i.am[...
More / Reply
 

Explore
Related flicks:
The Fifth Element
Gattaca
Terminator 2
more...

News
Sci-Fi Movie:
Click here for THE TIME MACHINE
> more... 
SciFlicks SQUAD!
SciFlicks SQUAD! Forums
Join Us.
SciFlicks SQUAD!
SciFlicks SQUAD! Forums
Join Us.

Copyright © 1998-2019 – Popcorn Studios.
All Movie Material and Media Copyright © 2000 – 20th Century Fox.
All Rights Reserved. For Personal, Non-Profit Use Only. Refer to Legal Notices for Details.
SciFlicks.com - Science Fiction Cinema